龐大的「金色穹頂」計畫在特朗普的五角大廈可能面臨審查不足

照片

(Jim Watson via Getty Images)

美國國防部長皮特·赫格塞斯（Pete Hegseth）宣布重組作戰測試與評估辦公室（DOT&E），將其人員從94人減少至46人，並終止所有承包商支援。 此舉引發外界對於特朗普政府推動的1,750億美元「金色穹頂」（Golden Dome）飛彈防禦計畫缺乏足夠審查的擔憂。

多位消息人士表示，赫格塞斯此舉部分是因為對DOT&E計劃對「金色穹頂」進行測試監督的不滿。 參議院軍事委員會資深成員傑克·里德（Jack Reed）批評此舉為「魯莽且有害」，認為削減人員將削弱對關鍵軍事計畫的獨立監督，可能導致未經充分測試的系統投入使用，危及作戰準備和納稅人資金。

DOT&E是由國會設立，負責對所有研發成本超過5.25億美元或採購成本超過30億美元的國防部計畫進行獨立監督。 目前，其監督的項目超過250個，包括F-35聯合打擊戰鬥機、陸軍的遠程高超音速武器和海軍的宙斯盾現代化計畫。

🔍 三大觀察重點

1. 「金色穹頂」計畫可能缺乏足夠的獨立測試與審查
   國防部削減DOT&E人員，可能導致對「金色穹頂」等大型軍事計畫的測試與評估不足，增加系統缺陷和失敗的風險。
2. 政治干預可能削弱軍事計畫的透明度與問責性
   削減獨立監督機構的資源，可能使軍事計畫在缺乏充分審查的情況下推進，降低政策制定的透明度和問責性。
3. 國會對國防部決策表示關切
   參議員傑克·里德等人對國防部的決策表示擔憂，認為此舉可能損害軍事計畫的完整性和有效性，呼籲恢復對關鍵計畫的全面監督。

📍 地理位置標示（GPS Coordinates）

• 美國國防部（五角大廈，維吉尼亞州阿靈頓）
   

  • 緯度：38.8719° N
  • 經度：77.0563° W

   

Behemoth Golden Dome May Face Lackluster Scrutiny in Trump’s Pentagon

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced a restructuring of the Office of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E), reducing its staff from 94 to 46 and terminating all contractor support. This move has raised concerns about insufficient oversight of the Trump administration’s $175 billion “Golden Dome” missile defense project.

Multiple sources indicated that Hegseth’s decision was partly driven by dissatisfaction with DOT&E’s plans to oversee testing for the Golden Dome. Senator Jack Reed, a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, criticized the move as “reckless and damaging,” arguing that reducing personnel would weaken independent oversight of critical military programs, potentially leading to the deployment of untested systems and jeopardizing operational readiness and taxpayer funds.

DOT&E, established by Congress, is responsible for independent oversight of all Department of Defense programs with research and development costs exceeding $525 million or procurement costs over $3 billion. Currently, it oversees more than 250 programs, including the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the Army’s Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon, and the Navy’s Aegis modernization program.

🔍 Three Key Takeaways

1. Golden Dome Project May Lack Adequate Independent Testing and Oversight
   The reduction in DOT&E personnel could lead to insufficient testing and evaluation of large-scale military projects like the Golden Dome, increasing the risk of system flaws and failures.
2. Political Interference May Undermine Transparency and Accountability in Military Programs
   Cutting resources from independent oversight bodies may allow military projects to proceed without thorough review, reducing policy transparency and accountability.
3. Congress Expresses Concern Over Department of Defense Decisions
   Senator Jack Reed and others have voiced concerns about the Department of Defense’s decisions, suggesting that such actions could compromise the integrity and effectiveness of military programs, and calling for the restoration of comprehensive oversight for critical initiatives.